by Brian DeChesare Comments (38)

From M&A Boutique Bank to Distressed Hedge Fund, Part 2: On the Job, Pay, and Exit Opps

iStock 530413290

One of the best parts of working at a hedge fund, besides the enormous piles of gold lining your mansion, is the fact that no one else understands what you do.

Until now.

In the second part of this interview on distressed hedge funds, you’re going to learn all about what you do on the job, how you make investment decisions, and more.

Here’s what you’ll learn inside:

  • What “distressed investing” means and what types of securities you’d focus on.
  • How financial modeling differs at hedge funds.
  • What an average day in your life will be like at a hedge fund.
  • How much money you’ll make at the entry-level, and as you move up the ladder.

Worried that hedge funds will lose some of their appeal now that all this information is out there in the public domain?

Don’t worry – at least you’ll still have your gold-lined mansion(s).

Let’s get started:

Distressed Investing from A to Z

Q: Let’s move into what you do on the job: what exactly is distressed investing, and how does the process work from beginning to end?

A: Sure. So, first off, the name “distressed investing” is actually a misnomer because we do a lot more than that.

In addition to real distressed companies, we look at anything that might be misunderstood by the market, over-leveraged but “good” companies, or ones that are otherwise at a disadvantage.

Investing in actual distressed companies, by contrast, means that you find firms that are having some type of financial trouble, are unable to fund their debt obligations, or are otherwise on the brink of bankruptcy, and then investing in their capital structure.

At my firm, we invest across everything; anything or any part of the capital structure that’s undervalued is fair game.

So if a large-cap firm is set to issue bonds at a 9% yield, for example, we might look at the firm’s capital structure and operations, and then figure out whether we should invest in their common equity or those bonds.

We focus on finding securities that are trading at huge discounts because most other people don’t understand them or don’t have the time to understand the complexity of the problem(s).

A lot of my work involves determining the effective yield of different securities – if the yield is less than 10%, we don’t pay much attention to it. We try to find securities that yield at least 10%, if not more than that.

And then we get into calculating the associated risk with the yield – finding the yield is just the first filtering point.

Q: So the yields on the bond side are pretty simple to figure out – just pull the information form Bloomberg – but what about for equities? How do you figure out the potential appreciation of a stock?

A: That comes down to digging into the company’s operating model and determining the key revenue and cost drivers for the year.

We’ll try to find a company that is undergoing some financial trouble – such as being over-leveraged or that is having macro problems but which is still a fundamentally good company – and then see which part of the capital structure we should invest in.

Let’s say, for example, that the company is valued at 7x EBITDA and the senior secured debt trades at 5x EBITDA – in that case we can essentially get our money back if things fail, so we’ll decide whether or not the equity is worth the risk.

We often use strategies such as longing one part of the capital structure and shorting another one.

We’ll talk to the industry consultants first and then the sell-side equity research analysts and ask what they think of the company’s prospects and the industry as a whole, the competition, and, if the company is in a distressed situation, whether or not it will survive.

The entire modeling and valuation process is very similar to what you do in banking.

But the difference is that on the buy-side, we actually care about the numbers – in banking, you might just enter a blind assumption like 10% revenue growth and 20% EBITDA margins, but here we would dig into all those numbers.

So to assume something like 10% revenue growth, we would need to understand where it’s coming from – Increased unit sales? Price increases? Wider distribution? And we would do channel checks and speak with a lot of people to verify those assumptions.

Then, based on the model and valuation we develop, we would see whether or not the company’s stock price might reasonably increase in a certain timeframe.

So if it’s trading at a 10x EBITDA multiple right now and we think revenue growth will exceed what the market expects, could its multiple increase? Or could anything else drive its stock price upward?

Q: Right, so it’s sort of like the difference between undergraduate and grad school: there’s less BS and more focus on work that actually matters.

What about on the distressed side specifically? How is the work different when you’re working with troubled companies?

A: There, we put a lot of thought into how the debt is valued and whether or not we can invest at a cheap price.

So if we can get in at a discount price, we might be able to win the company’s assets if and when the company files for bankruptcy.

It depends a bit on what the ultimate outcome of the bankruptcy is – Chapter 7? Chapter 11? A distressed sale? – but those are issues we would think about.

Normally there’s a lot of overlap with the legal side in distressed M&A, but at least at our fund, a team of lawyers helps out with anything legal that comes up and we consult with them when asking about what might happen, how it could impact the returns, and so on.

Q: What about an average day in your life? What does a hedge fund analyst actually do?

A: I generally get in around 6 AM because I’m on the west coast of the US, but the markets are based on Eastern Time; if you’re in NY or somewhere else with no time zone difference, you would not have to arrive that early.

Some people actually have to arrive even earlier than me depending on their fund’s strategy – since we focus more on value investing, I need to be here by the time the market opens but not hours in advance or anything.

When I’m at the office I spend most of my time researching new investments, updating our models for companies we’re looking at, reading news sources, and speaking with sell-side analysts.

I might also work with the more senior people on my team to go through models and determine the valuation of different stocks.

Some meetings can last 2 – 3 hours, so what I described above often takes up the majority of the day.

That may not sound terribly exciting, but then we also don’t have to deal with constant client emergencies, crazy VPs punching their fists through car windows, and all the fun you see in banking.

Generally the junior analysts here focus on modeling and research work, and the associates are tasked with meeting people, coming up with investment ideas, and vetting investment ideas that other people have come up with.

No one does much sourcing (i.e. cold calling) here – overall, it’s far more common in PE/VC and especially in growth PE.

We also get tons of inbound emails (100+ per day) from bankers pitching secondary equity and debt offerings (we rarely buy primary offerings), so there isn’t much of a need to cold call companies.

I usually leave around 7 to 9 PM – roughly the same as the hours in sales & trading, if you make the sales & trading vs investment banking comparison.

On weekdays I don’t have much free time since I have to wake up so early, but weekends are usually free.

The Ladder, the Pay, and the Exit Opps

Q: You mentioned just now how analysts and associates focus on different tasks at your fund.

What about the rest of the hierarchy? How is different from what you see in the investment banking career path, and how do you advance?

A: At my office, it’s relatively “flat” in that if you have a great idea, you can go talk to the Partners directly.

It’s not like banking where you have to run everything you do up the chain from associate to VP to MD before anyone can make a decision.

As for the structure, it’s Analyst, Associate, and the Partners of the firm at the top.

There isn’t a strict set of years required to advance – it’s more about how much you produce (come up with great investment ideas, and then keep coming up with them) rather than how long you’ve been there.

Generally, though, “Analysts” are straight out of a 2-year investment banking role and “Associates” have more like 5+ years of experience, usually in banking and then in something else on the buy-side after that.

Usually you’re an Analyst for about 2 years, and after that, you either get promoted, you move somewhere else, or you go back to business school.

It is very, very difficult to make the leap to Partner here – much harder than it is in investment banking, where you simply have to land a certain number of clients/deals as a VP to advance.

You’ll never make it here unless you come up with great investment ideas and achieve great returns.

As a result, there’s a massive gap between Partners and everyone else. It’s much more lopsided than what you see on the sell-side, where MDs are compensated well, but not 50x better than everyone else.

Q: And speaking of compensation, how exactly does it work? We all hear stories of people earning ridiculous bonuses at hedge funds, but is that always what happens?

Is it based on a percentage of your P&L, as in prop trading, or is it more standardized at the junior levels?

A: I hate to always respond with, “It depends on the fund” – but that’s the truth.

Usually the Partner-level people are the ones who really benefit from the 2% management fee and the carry, because they take the bulk of that for themselves.

So let’s say you’re at a $5 billion fund and you therefore have $100 million in management fees to go around each year.

The Partners might take 60 – 70% or more of that and therefore leave only 30-40% for the dozens of other professionals there. That still adds up to a lot of money, but you can see how the senior people make the truly out-sized paydays – just from the management fees alone.

If they have a good year and get even a 10% return, that’s another $100 million (10% * $5B * 20%) they get for themselves. So Partners can easily earn in the tens of millions per year.

I can’t speak to Associate pay, but as an Analyst at a mid-sized fund you might make around $100K USD base salary with a $100 – $120K USD bonus – and if your fund does well, you might see more than that.

I would assume that Associates, just as in banking, make significantly more than that and that you generally make more at bigger funds since there are higher management fees to go around (supporting data).

Q: Right, so basically you’re still well-compensated at the junior levels, but it’s not necessarily a dramatic increase over what you would earn as a 2nd or 3rd year analyst in IB, at least when you’re an entry-level analyst at a mid-sized fund.

What about the exit opportunities? Is it true that it’s much more difficult to move around in the hedge fund world since your skills are so specialized?

A: Most often, people go to business school or get promoted internally.

If you’ve broken into the hedge fund industry and you leave altogether, it means you either weren’t good at your job or you’ve decided that finance isn’t for you.

You’re correct that there’s more movement within investment banking and private equity – there, the skill sets are very transferrable between different firms and groups, so moving around isn’t as much of an issue.

Many hedge funds, by contrast, are looking for people with very specific experience – European telecom M&A arbitrage, for example – and may ignore you if you don’t match their profile 100%.

So it’s uncommon to move from, say, merger arbitrage to a value fund, or to move from a global macro fund to a value fund.

And as your previous interviewees have confirmed, even moving to and from prop trading is difficult because most prop trading firms focus on market making rather than directional trading.

But moving from, say, a value fund to another value fund is not that uncommon, nor is moving from a macro fund to another macro fund.

Q: Awesome. So you either stay in and get promoted, you move to another closely-related fund, or you go back to business school.

Which of those options will you pursue? Any big exit opportunities you have planned?

A: Not sure yet – will have to see what my bonus looks like this year first!

Q: Not a bad way to make a decision. Thanks for the chat!

A: Yup, enjoyed speaking!

M&A Boutique to Distressed Hedge Fund Series:

M&I - Brian

About the Author

Brian DeChesare is the Founder of Mergers & Inquisitions and Breaking Into Wall Street. In his spare time, he enjoys memorizing obscure Excel functions, editing resumes, obsessing over TV shows, traveling like a drug dealer, and defeating Sauron.

Break Into Investment Banking

Free Exclusive Report: 57-page guide with the action plan you need to break into investment banking - how to tell your story, network, craft a winning resume, and dominate your interviews

We respect your privacy. Please refer to our full privacy policy.


Read below or Add a comment

  1. Avatar
    James Morgan

    How different is high yield bond investing than distressed debt? Is there hedge funds specifically for high yield bonds, is the investment process similar to distressed investing? Also, is comp high in high yield and is the future outlook for it good?

    1. It’s quite different because with high-yield bonds, there is rarely any “upside” beyond the coupon on the bond. So you focus on assessing the downside risk. With distressed investing in equity and/or bonds, there may be significant upside potential if the security is currently mispriced. Can’t speak to the future for high-yield bond investing, but take a look at the articles on mezzanine investing and direct lending on this site to learn more.

  2. Great interview, congrats!

    My Background:
    – 5 years in a capital markets investment boutique (emerging market), structuring associate, focus on high yield debt and strucuted products (deal focused job).
    – 2 years in another capital markets investment boutique, credit research associate, focus (again) on HY debt and structured products (job is to help the partners in the internal approval process for new deals).
    – CFA Level I, very good financial modelling skills, applying for a FT MBA this year.

    – Associate position in a credit hedge fund (focus on HY debt, distressed debt or structured produts).

    Is this a reasonable path to pursue?
    Any thoughts about how can I improve my chances to break in?

    Thanks in advance!

    I’m from an emerging market, 30 years old, and worked for almost 5,5 years in the capital markets team of an investment boutique. The deals were structuring of high yield debt securities for distressed or middle market companies (usually with complex guarantees, credit enhacements etc.), and a lot of asset backed securities. My job was to execute the deal from the beginning to the end.

    After that (1,5 years until now) I joined the capital markets team of another investment boutique (very similar to the previous one). But now I’m a credit research associate, and my job is to do thorough credit analysis of non-investment grade companies and help the partners in the internal approval process for new deals. I’m thinking about going to the buy-side for a while, and my current job made made me decide to pursue a job in a credit hedge fund (high yield, distressed, structured products).

    On my previous jobs I could develop very good complex financial modelling skills. I’m currently preparing myself to apply for a Full Time MBA this year (Europe or US) and my goal is to work in a bigger and more developed market (US or UK).

    Do you think this is a reasonable path to pursue? What do you think I can do to improve my chances?

    Thank you very much for your great article!

    1. Yes. Best way to improve your chances is to network heavily because most HF recruiting is off-cycle and to prepare great credit investment pitches. Also see:

  3. How did your bonus turn out?

  4. Hi, why do many HF and PE firms love IB guys? In my opinion, someone who worked at a smaller asset management firm after university would seem more appealing.


    1. Avatar
      M&I - Nicole

      I’ve written two articles which address your questions:

      The training at a smaller AM firm may not be as structured, comprehensive and relevant

  5. I wish the pays in hedge funds weren’t so ridiculous. I just want to work there because the work sounds so interesting! Ugh, so much competition with people entering finance just for the money….

    1. Avatar
      M&I - Nicole

      You may want to check out this article The latter part maybe interesting to you

  6. What is the difference between distressed investing and value investing?

    Also, what opportunities are there for lawyers with corporate restructuring experience?

    Finally, is Warren Buffet considered a distressed investor?

    1. Avatar
      M&I - Nicole

      Distressed investing – Investing in instruments of a company that is near or is currently going through bankruptcy
      Value investing – Investing in stocks that trade for less than their intrinsic values

      We will have an article on value investing so stay tuned!

      Yes you can check out M&A or Restructuring

      Yes you can say so too –

      You may find interesting

  7. Can you break down the example he gives regarding the company’s senior leverage ratio at 5x and valuation at 7x? He mentions that the investor would be able to recover his investment and it seems like he’s talking about an equity investment, but it’s not entirely clear – is he assuming that this is an accurate valuation of an already distressed company that has its debt trading at a discount, yet there is still 2x equity value? Is he assuming a liquidation scenario where equity investors would recover the full 2x EBITDA value after paying back par value of the debt at 5x? That doesn’t seem intuitively that it would qualify as a distressed scenario. I may be over thinking this simple example way too much, but some clarity would be appreciated

    1. I’m not 100% certain as this interview was from over a year ago, but I believe he just meant that if the company is valued at 7x and the debt trades at 5x, in the case of a bankruptcy or liquidation scenario, since the debt is secured presumably they would get back a high percentage of their investment in it.

      As an equity investor, you likely wouldn’t get anything even if the equity is only valued at 2x. So I think he was talking about investing in the senior secured debt here.

  8. Do the hours you work at a hedge fund slowly decrease like they do in banking or do they stay flat at around 60-80 a week?


    1. Avatar
      M&I - Nicole

      I think it depends. If you work for a HF and are a good performer, chances are you will be thinking of work/markets most of the time.

  9. If you start out as an analyst at a HF how likely are you to climb internally to the partner level? Obviously it’s dependent on performance but is it more common to be promoted internally or to leave for a better position at another fund? I assume the analyst to associate jump is pretty common internally but are more people made partners at their fund or do more people leave their fund to become a partner at another? Thanks!

    1. Avatar
      M&I - Nicole

      I think it really depends on your performance, the fund’s performance and the fund’s structure

  10. Great interviews, as usual.
    Believe it or not, this actually made me start to get interested in HF.

  11. Unrelated, but what’s the difference between DCM/ECM and debt/equity financing in IBD? Thanks

    1. They’re similar, but in dedicated DCM/ECM groups you follow the market more and are responsible for market/industry trend etc. slides whereas in IBD you don’t do that as much but instead focus on specific deals. If you look at the ECM and DCM articles there is a good description of how IB and ECM/DCM interact on deals:

  12. One question – how is the “deal flow” during economic booms? Is it still good or are distressed debt investors mostly active during recessions?

    Great article btw!

    1. They just shift to doing more non-distressed investments, i.e. typical value-oriented investments. So maybe not quite as active, but they probably wouldn’t suffer as much as, say, a bank that focuses on distressed M&A during an economic boom.

  13. The Partners might take 60 – 70% or more of that and therefore leave only 30-40% for the dozens of other professionals there.
    Someone go tell Obama that there is income inequality in finance too…we need him to help redistribute the wealth…
    Maybe we should launch an operation: “Occupy HF Partners”
    Please Brian, could you go around finding the one-man-show HF Manager for interview too?

    1. Hah, good one. Yes, time to protest The 1% of HF Managers who make 99% of all profits.

      Occupy Hedge Fund Partners!

      1. in a way its right
        But the US govt will never introduce salary caps will they?
        It will get worse if the republicans come in power

        1. The US gov doesn’t have authority to set salary caps on private entities.

        2. Avatar
          M&I - Nicole

          I don’t think they can intro salary caps but who knows..

  14. Modelling and research work sounds great

    1. Yeah, the stakes are definitely higher than in IB but the work itself is similar in some ways

      1. How much of it is down to the prestige factor, i mean the “i work for a Hedge Fund” factor

  15. Avatar
    Mark Edwards

    Thanks for the informative interview.
    This may be a nave question, but do hedge funds recruit MBAs heavily from business schools and what concentration in business school is best suited if you want to get into hedge funds (specifically distressed funds). I had 1 year of M&A experience before attending top 5 business school. Thanks

    1. Avatar
      M&I - Nicole

      Hedge funds do recruit MBAs but I think they care more about your previous experience. Concentration – I believe Accounting and Finance. This article should also help

  16. Is it reasonably easy to transfer from one value fund to another? What if one fund is, say, focusing on distressed situations (but within the value philosophy) and another is not?

    1. Wouldn’t say it’s “easy” but certainly easier than moving over from a completely different type of strategy. Something like distressed / value to non-distressed / value is possible but gets harder the longer you focus on distressed investments.

  17. Great job as always!

    Does interviewee have CFA? ^_^

    Can someone provide the dynamics/culture of getting in a hedge fund without investment banking background? From this article, it appears 95% are from ibanking…would someone getting in from outside of ibanking be viewed/judged differently?

    1. There’s some coverage in the other HF article:

      If you haven’t done banking, you’re more likely to go to another type of fund (i.e. not value-oriented or merger arbitrage, more likely something such as global macro). Without doing banking you’re better off going to a small fund or doing something like asset management or trading first.

      Oh, and the interviewee does not have a CFA.

  18. Great article as usual. Also I would like to make a point about the ridiculous number of impostors that are popping up up everywhere trying to “Teach” people how to break into IB/PE/HF! They need to chill out

    1. Thanks! Yeah, most imitators disappear after a few months once they realized the amount of work that’s required.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *