“Katie Couric: What one personal flaw do you think might hinder your ability to be president?
Barack Obama: I don’t think there’s… a flaw that would hinder my ability to function as president. I think that all of us have things we need to improve. You know, I said during the primary that my management of paper can sometimes be a problem.”
Ah, the “greatest weakness” interview question.
If even Barack Obama – one of the world’s greatest masters of spin – can’t even come up with a good answer to this one, what hope do you have?
It’s one of the most difficult and controversial questions in interviews, but if you follow the guidelines here you’ll at least be able to give a better response than Obama – and you’ll land an offer or 2 in the process.
This question – and its many variants, such as “What are your 3 greatest weaknesses?” and “What constructive criticism have you received?” – is a silly one to ask in interviews because:
- 90% of the time interviewees give non-answers that tell you nothing about their abilities.
- The other 10% of the time, they give a legitimate weakness or say something ridiculous that sinks their chances, even if they could actually do the job well.
But that doesn’t mean you won’t get the question anyway – bankers, after all, are from rational.
It’s arguably the toughest “fit” question to answer because:
- Unlike telling your “story,” there’s no template you can follow.
- There is no consensus on what a “good” answer is.
- If you say something stupid or inappropriate, you might get dinged on the spot.
There are 2 schools of thought on how to answer the weakness question in interviews:
- Give a BS answer like “I work too much” or “I’m too much of a perfectionist.”
- Give a legitimate weakness, like saying that you sometimes lose focus when working on extended projects, or that you have trouble delegating work to others, and then show how you’ve been working to improve yourself.
Which One is Correct?
Neither one – or at least, neither one is the best way to answer this question.
Giving a non-answer like the examples in #1 won’t necessarily sink your chances, but the interviewer may stop you mid-sentence and call your bluff, or tell you that you should give a real weakness rather than a fake one.
Some suggest that you should give a non-answer like this because the “weakness” question is just a test of your BSing abilities, which are critical in banking.
I don’t agree with that because the entire interview is a test of your ability to spin the facts and make yourself look better – there’s no need to ask a question like this just to test your ability to spin.
Giving a legitimate weakness that affects your ability to do the job could go either way – occasionally the interviewer will appreciate how you gave a real weakness, but more often than not they will doubt your ability to do the job if you say something that hits too close to home (e.g. you have poor attention to detail).
And the last thing you want to do in an interview is plant a seed of doubt in the mind of the interviewer.
What NOT to Say
You should avoid non-answers, answers that show a lack of self-respect, joke answers, and legitimate weaknesses that impair your ability to be a banker:
- “I work too hard!” (non-answer)
- “I’m a perfectionist and expect too much of others.” (non-answer)
- “I go to a non-target school. / I’m not a finance major.” (lack of self-respect)
- “I have chronic back pain / other physical problems.” (TMI)
- “I can’t multi-task well.” (please give up on being a banker right now)
- “I’m not good with numbers.” (you will get tossed out of the interview)
- “I’m too shy.” (this just sounds weird)
- “I have no weaknesses!” (non-answer / joke answer)
- “I voted for [Name] / I’m [Religion Name] religion” (this shows poor judgment)
You may think these sound ridiculous, but I’ve heard variations of everything here mentioned in real interviews and mock interviews.
I know someone will now leave a comment below and say that they gave one of these answers in an interview and it actually worked – and that may happen sometimes, depending on whether your answer was just bad or really bad.
If the interview is going well and you’ve been joking around and talking about non-work-related topics for awhile, your chances of getting away with a joke answer go up.
But you must make sure that your delivery indicates that it’s a joke – if you say it completely straight-faced and don’t laugh afterward, they may assume you’re serious when you triumphantly shout, “I have no weaknesses!”
Unless you’re extremely skilled at interviews and reading people – and if you’re a university student, there’s a 98% chance you’re not – I would stay away from these answers and try a different approach instead.
Criteria for “Less Bad” Answers
There’s still no good answer to this question, but there are answers that are “less bad” than others.
Here’s what you need for a solid answer:
- Your weakness has to be legitimate – no perfectionism, chronic back pain, or claiming that you have no weaknesses.
- But it can’t affect your ability to be an investment banking analyst or associate – so please don’t say that you can’t work long hours, that you easily forget about details, or that you have trouble working in a team.
- And it also has to be something that you’ve been actively working to improve.
Take Me to the Examples, Please
Most advice stops here and doesn’t present sample responses you could give in an interview. So we’re going to fix that by providing not 1, but 3, example answers you could give.
Before you leave a comment saying, “OMGWTF that answer is stupid!!!!” realize that none of these answers is perfect, or even “good” – rather, they are “less bad” alternatives to the really bad answers above.
“Sometimes I Get Too Hung Up on the Details and Don’t See the Bigger Picture.”
The main problem is that this could come across as a non-answer depending on how you phrase it – there’s a thin line between “getting lost in the details” and “working too hard.”
If you want to use this one, you need to give an example of how this affected something real – you were so focused on getting the numbers perfect in one part of the project that you didn’t pay enough attention to the live presentation and lost the audience’s attention in the beginning since you weren’t organized.
But since then, you’ve been working to better allocate time and keep your presentations organized.
This one is good because it’s legitimate, or at least quasi-legitimate, and it doesn’t hurt your ability to be a banker as much as poor attention to detail or inability to multi-task would.
The main downside is that some bankers will see this one as BS and ask you for something real – at which point you could go into a specific example like the one above, or give another sample response here instead.
“I Don’t Have Much / Any Investment Banking or Finance Experience.”
Some bankers will see this one as a non-answer because no one entering the field has experience – but plenty of incoming bankers have had internships before.
The bigger risk is that it may come across as “too real” – so you need to follow-up and talk about how you’ve been getting up to speed and learning a lot on your own, via friends, training programs, and other sources.
You could also point out while no one has full-time experience, some people have had internships where they learned the ropes.
You have to be really careful with the wording because you don’t want to discount yourself – don’t say, “I was an engineering major and not a finance major, so everyone else knows more than me.”
Say, “I haven’t had as much finance experience as other people, so I’ve been working to get up to speed and learn more on my own.”
There’s a subtle difference between this answer and the “I’m not a finance major” one in the Responses to Avoid: the answer here relates to experience, which is at least partially beyond your control, while the other one relates to your major, which is more within your control.
“I’m Not Good at Public Speaking.”
This is a legitimate weakness that hurts your ability to advance in some fields of business – like sales or executive positions – but which is not critical for entry-level investment banking roles.
You do have to communicate via email, on the phone, and in-person all the time as an analyst or associate – but you rarely, if ever, present to large audiences in-person.
Once again, some interviewers may call your bluff and say it’s not a real weakness because public speaking is not critical as a banker – in which case you can use one of the other suggestions above instead.
For this one you should also mention something more specific than “not being good” at public speaking – you get too nervous, you go on for too long, or you don’t properly allocate time – and then say how you’ve been improving (practicing, classes, Toastmasters Club, etc.).
One-Time & Non-Recurring Questions and Footnotes
You won’t always get the exact “What’s your greatest weakness?” question. Other variations include:
- “What are your 3 greatest weaknesses?”
- “What are your 3 greatest weaknesses? I know the first 2 will be BS, so give me 3.”
- “What would your friends say about you?” (Strengths and weaknesses)
- “What flaw do you have that could hurt your ability to do this job?” (The Obama question)
None of these is much different or more difficult than the original question.
Explaining your strengths is easier than giving your weaknesses (give a strength that’s highly relevant to IB, like quantitative ability, and then a specific example of when you used it), so there’s not much to say there.
For the questions where you’re asked to give multiple weaknesses, you could give 2 “non-answers” for the first 2 weaknesses, and then give a real weakness for the last one – if they expect you to do that anyway, you might as well play along.
You might get called out on the “Obama” weakness question if you say something like public speaking, so be prepared with something that’s more relevant to banking, such as lack of experience.
Your Greatest Weaknesses?
So what’s your greatest weakness?
Hopefully your answer doesn’t start with “None” or include “the management of paper.”
And you might just get the offer, even if you still can’t win a US presidential election.