“The first thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers.”
-William Shakespeare, Henry VI Part 2, Act IV
Decided to kill your career in law and switch into banking? Want to be paid by the results instead of by the hour (and hopefully make one of those astronomical investment banking bonuses)?
The good news is that it’s fairly common for lawyers to switch into finance and investment banking specifically. There are a few paths you can take from law into finance:
- Get an investment banking job immediately out of law school.
- Work as an Associate at a law firm for several years and then lateral to an Associate position at a bank.
- Go to business school after practicing for a few years and interview for banking jobs as you finish your MBA.
Method #1 sounds appealing but is difficult to pull off. Most banks do not recruit someone immediately out of law school because the candidate would be stuck somewhere between Analyst and Associate - more experience than someone fresh out of undergrad, but not as much as MBAs with 3-5 years of work experience.
If you had finance experience before law school, your chances of breaking in increase substantially. You just need to tell a good story about why you did law and are now switching back.
If you haven’t had relevant experience, it’s better to work for a few years and transition over from a related law field such as Securities or M&A. I would recommend option #3 above - going to business school after law school - only if you have worked in a completely unrelated law field for several years and decide you want to stop defending employees and start producing lots of PowerPoint.
Ok, I’ll Go Work - What Should I Do?
You need to do Corporate Law. People have asked me if it’s possible to Intellectual Property, Employment, Litigation, and a whole host of other law specialties and switch into investment banking.
It’s not. You need to do Corporate Law.
Repeat after me: You need to do Corporate Law. Here’s a direct quote from our bank’s recruiter when I asked her this very question:
“We look at lawyers for Associate positions… a few years working in Corporate Law and getting transaction experience is a good background. It’s tough if you have done something unrelated… there are too many other qualified candidates.”
It’s not impossible to get in from other fields of law. But recruiting is ultimately a numbers game, and coming from a Corporate/Securities/M&A Law background increases your odds greatly.
Banks view their profession - doing major deals with corporate clients - as the center of the universe, like how people in the Middle Ages thought Earth was the center of the universe. One step removed from the center are other professions that deal with transactions, like Corporate Law, Tax and Accounting. If you go beyond the Outer Rim you get to people who have “real jobs” at “real companies” - companies that sell products rather than professional services.
Your goal should be to get as close as possible to the center. Even if, just like the Earth in the Middle Ages, bankers are not in fact the center of the universe.
Once you have enough experience working on transactions (usually after 2-3 years), you can think about switching into finance. Contact all your friends in the industry and ask for referrals to headhunters. Also contact any clients you worked with on transactions and ask about setting up informational meetings or discussing opportunities at their firms.
It’s best to target the industries and types of clients you worked with. So if you did Securities Law for financial institutions, focus on the Financial Institutions Groups (FIG) at banks. If you drafted purchase agreements in M&A deals for the energy industry, focus your attention on Energy groups and M&A teams at banks. And if you ever worked with UBS LA, stay far, far away.
A final tip: if you’re making a career change, it will likely be easier to get into a boutique investment bank rather than a bulge bracket, especially if you haven’t worked on high-profile transactions before.
I Have Some Leads, Now How Do I Sell?
Coming from a Corporate Law background, no one will doubt that you have the stamina to do banking. And you’ll be well on your way to truly understanding investment banking. You’ll have to prove 2 points: 1) you have the quantitative and finance skills to do the job and 2) you’re actually willing to make a big career change after 5-6 years of commitment to law.
In my guide to getting investment banking jobs, I wrote “don’t worry about the finance questions.” If you’re a lawyer getting into finance, you should do the opposite and pretend those finance questions are nuclear-tipped missiles headed directly toward you.
You should know the 3 financial statements cold. Be able to explain models and valuation methods because they will GRILL you on this. This is especially the case if you were an English major before law school and have no quantitative/finance experience (unlike the engineer breaking into finance). You should know Money Chimp like the back of your hand. Studying for a CFA course might not be a bad idea, and consider one of the finance training courses on WallStreetOasis. Make this an all-out effort to know everything about finance an incoming MBA Associate would be expected to know and you will succeed.
In some ways making the case for a career change is easier. Here’s how to frame your story:
“In law school I was always interested in the world of corporate finance and mergers & acquisitions. I took a lot of classes in the field and went to work in M&A at BIGLAW firm after graduation. I enjoyed the work at first but after a few years I was envious of the bankers on these deals. I understand both lifestyles are tough, but they actually got to see everything from beginning to end and could directly influence whether or not a company was sold. All I could do was sit on the sidelines and comment on specific issues in contracts and agreements. I want to be the dealmaker, or at least be close to the dealmaker, rather than just be the person drafting up legalese.”
And If All Else Fails
And if things don’t go as planned, you could always just go to Brazil and open your own surf shop, like this guy. (Kidding). In all seriousness, if you have any questions or comments email me or leave a comment below.
Coming up later this week: how to stay healthy with an investment banking job, and how to pick your investment banking team.
Like this post? Subscribe via RSS and start understanding investment banking.
Tags: Corporate Law, finance industry, investment banking, investment banking associate, investment banking interviews, investment banking jobs, Mergers & Acquisitions, Securities Law
What a fantastic blog full with top-notch information. I’m an aspiring corporate lawyer/ibanker myself (jr. in college) and the entires here def. answer a good 70% of any of the questions I have. Please keep writing!
Glad you enjoyed the content. More is on the way soon.
Any thoughts on an M&A lawyer trying to bypass IB and go straight to PE? Seems like a corporate lawyer’s skills would be best used at a PE shop but would a PE shop give you a chance to learn modeling, etc. skills the way an IB would? Just trying to figure out if spending a few years at an IB is absolutely necessary. Also, where would a 5th or 6th year associate go in? 2nd-3rd year associate? Thanks for your help.
Big C - you can try it and I’m sure it happens sometimes but I think M&A lawyers going over to PE is more common at the Partner level - I know quite a few Partner-level lawyers who have become MDs at PE firms, for example. If you have a connection to PE somehow, definitely go for it. Otherwise I would say try banking first and then switch.
As far as 5th or 6th year associate, most likely 2nd or 3rd year associate at a bank like you said.
I really enjoy reading your blog. It contains some indepth knowledge of the scene. My way will be similar, trying to get with an international known corporate law firm. But I’m pretty sure, one will get the network of influence people while working with a top tier law firm! BTW can you name some top tier law firms globally?
Hi CBK - thanks for your comments on my blog. Working at a well-known international corporate law firm, you’ll definitely get a great network of contacts that you can leverage to move into banking.
The Vault has a list of the most prestigious law firms here: http://www.vault.com/nr/lawrankings.jsp?law2007=2&ch_id=242&top100=1
It is very US-focused but I imagine most of them have international branches as well.
I enjoyed reading your blog and found it very informative. What are the chances for a tax lawyer with 7 years experience in M&A and leveraged finance who is current at B-school to go the I-Banking (specifically structuring) route? Is my 7 years in tax going to work against me?
Hi Jay - glad you enjoy my blog.
While the 7 years of tax experience won’t necessarily help you, your M&A and leveraged finance experience most certainly will (if I’m interpreting that correctly).
It’s definitely possible to get into banking with your background, but with the current market environment and everything I would recommend focusing on smaller firms.
Also with your background I would really focus on your “story” - why are you switching from tax lawyer to investment banker, and why did you not do corporate law originally? They may grill you on why you chose tax rather than corporate law if you were really interested in finance so I would focus on how you’re going to answer that one.
In some ways, someone like you almost has a better chance at PE firms and other types of finance vs. banks but it will likely be much harder to get into those in generally so I’d stay focused on banks.
I really am becoming a huge fan of your column! Is there going to be a part three of this informative series for accounting junkies coming out soon? I am going to be graduating with a masters in accountancy and will be able to sit for the CPA exam in roughly a year and would like to be well prepared for directing my career in the investment banking realm by ways of your advise. Secondly, between tax and audit, which branch of accountancy is preferred most by certain investment banking divisions?
Hi bluetrane, thanks, glad you are becoming a fan of this site!
I’ve been trying to continue this series for accounting people, consultants and others for quite some time, but unfortunately I know significantly more about lawyers and engineers getting into banking so I have focused on those for now.
I do hope to finish up this series or at least add one more this month, no guarantees though.
As far as tax vs. audit, I don’t know that there’s a preference per se… if I were getting into accounting and wanted to do i-banking, I would try to get into transaction services or anything relating to deals as soon as possible. That’s probably the most relevant division of accounting firms for getting into banking.
Hey Inqui!
I don’t want to sound repetitive….but this blog rocks!!!
May I ask you if you’re planning to write a “Breaking into Finance” from Consulting? (differentiating the background by MBB/Big4/Boutiques and Strat/Ops) Cheers!!!
Hi there, glad you like the site.
I’m working on a couple other “Breaking In” articles but they take quite a long time to write since I have to do so much research, so haven’t been able to finish them yet.
Inquisitor, thanks for the solid tips for those of us who are thinking about breaking into banking.
I have a background in consulting and start-ups but want to shift gears and go into finance. I am starting business school in fall and am doing research on possible careers I should look into. Naturally, banking came up.
Life as an analyst definitely has its drawbacks, most notably the hours. How would the life of a first-year associate out of a top-10 business school with no prior banking experience differ from the life of an analyst? What do analysts and associates alike think of associates and others with MBAs in general? And based on your experience, are the hours more back-breaking on Wall Street compared to say, London?
Thanks in advance.
First-year Associate out of top 10 b-school would have near-identical hours compared to a 1st year Analyst - banks treat them both the same way. After that it gets a bit better for the Associate, but it’s still pretty painful, to be honest.
I don’t think there’s one particular view toward those with MBAs, but if you have no prior banking experience you might find a bit of resentment from those who have been doing it for a few years (obviously depends greatly on group/firm).
London hours are a bit better than those on Wall Street but it’s still not close to a 9-5 job by any means.